MIL News Weekly

(Ep 68) MIL News Weekly 13-19 Sep 2026
===

[00:00:00]

[00:00:00] Weekly Briefing Intro
---

Welcome to the MIL News Weekly for 13-19 September 2026 your essential guide to the latest news impacting the military and veteran community. Whether you're currently serving in uniform, a military retiree, a veteran, or a family member, this is your source for the critical updates you need to know.

Each week, we cut through the noise to bring you the most important developments from the Pentagon, Capitol Hill, and the Department of Veterans Affairs. We’ll cover everything from new policies and pay raises affecting active and reserve forces to changes in healthcare and benefits for retirees, and the latest on VA services and legislation for our veterans. Let's get you informed. Here’s what’s happened this past week.

[00:00:41]  Issues That Affect Active and Reserve Military Personnel
---

Issues That Affect Active and Reserve Military Personnel

[00:00:44] Testosterone Screening Update
---

We begin with an update to a story from Episode 66. That episode explained that the Pentagon had posted, then temporarily withdrawn, draft clinical guidance for testosterone-deficiency screening. The material change this week is that the Defense Health Agency issued replacement [00:01:00] guidance, and the revised policy is narrower and more specific.

Under the update released on 17 September, every male service member over age 30 is to be screened for low testosterone during the Periodic Health Assessment. Male service members under 30 may also be tested when they report symptoms and request testing. The symptoms listed in the guidance include reduced libido, loss of spontaneous morning erections, erectile dysfunction, diminished energy and physical performance, difficulty concentrating, reduced muscle mass, and depressed mood.

The guidance also cautions that those symptoms overlap with conditions common in military life, including sleep restriction, calorie deficits, psychological stress, mild traumatic brain injury, and mood disorders. That is important because a symptom questionnaire is a starting point, not a diagnosis. The clinical process must distinguish testosterone deficiency from other health problems before treatment is considered.

This week’s clarification also changed the scope described in earlier Pentagon messaging. A July [00:02:00] memorandum suggested that all service members would undergo testing. The replacement guidance makes the current requirement specific to men, while the department says separate clinical guidance for women is still forthcoming. The Pentagon had not publicly clarified by the end of this reporting period whether the future women’s protocol would involve estrogen testing, testosterone therapy, or another approach.

For active-duty members, the screening is linked to the regular Periodic Health Assessment. For National Guard and Reserve members, application will depend on when they complete the military health assessment required for their status and component. Members should not self-diagnose or obtain hormones outside authorized medical care. Research supports testosterone therapy for some men with diagnosed hypogonadism, but benefits are less clear for younger men or normal aging, and treatment can carry risks including reduced fertility. The actionable point is to report symptoms honestly, discuss other possible causes with a clinician, and [00:03:00] ask how the final guidance applies to an individual duty status.

[00:03:03] Coast Guard Assault Plan
---

Our second personnel development concerns the Coast Guard’s response to sexual assault. On 17 September, the service released a Sexual Assault Prevention, Response and Recovery Action Plan containing 17 steps in four categories: prevention, response, recovery, and accountability. The plan sets objectives for commands to complete by the first quarter of fiscal year 2028.

The measures include improving training, updating response and medical-response protocols, reinforcing instruction on reporting, developing prosecution measures, shortening separation timelines, and addressing retaliation through training and tracking. Coast Guard Commandant Admiral Kevin Lunday said responsibility extends to active-duty, reserve, civilian, and Auxiliary personnel. That makes the plan directly relevant to the entire Coast Guard workforce, not only the academy or active component.

The release came one day before the Government Accountability Office issued a short oversight brief criticizing the [00:04:00] Coast Guard for slow and incomplete reporting to Congress. GAO said the service still lacked a performance plan for measuring progress on sexual-misconduct reforms, a problem analysts had identified two years earlier. The Coast Guard’s new implementation plan satisfies one prior GAO recommendation, but GAO continued to identify gaps in leadership, monitoring, and employee engagement.

The history explains the scrutiny. Operation Fouled Anchor substantiated 60 cases of rape, assault, and sexual harassment at the Coast Guard Academy from 1988 through 2006. A later Accountability and Transparency Review made 33 recommendations, but only five had been implemented by March 2024. The new plan is therefore best understood as a schedule and accountability framework—not proof that the intended cultural change has already occurred.

For Coast Guard members, the immediate practical change is clearer command-level work with stated end dates. The plan does not replace existing reporting channels, [00:05:00] victim advocacy, medical care, or law-enforcement procedures. A member who experiences or witnesses misconduct should use the authorized reporting and support options available now rather than wait for a fiscal year 2028 milestone. Progress should be judged by completed actions, timely case handling, protection against retaliation, and transparent reporting—not by publication of the plan alone.

[00:05:22] VGLI Premium Holiday
---

[00:05:22]  Issues That Affect Retired Military Personnel
---

Issues That Affect Retired Military Personnel

The major retiree-related benefit development is VA’s first premium holiday for Veterans’ Group Life Insurance, or VGLI. VA announced on 16 September that eligible policyholders will owe no premiums for three months, beginning in November 2026 and ending in January 2027.

VGLI is term life insurance that allows veterans to maintain coverage after leaving military service by paying premiums based on age and the amount of insurance selected. More than 457,000 veterans participate. VA said the average premium is about $110 per month, producing an average three-month [00:06:00] saving of about $330. The agency estimates the nationwide total at nearly $150 million.

Eligibility is straightforward but important: the VGLI policy must be current and must not have lapsed or been canceled for nonpayment. VA says eligible policyholders will receive the holiday automatically and will be notified by letter or email. No application is required. Someone who prepaid premiums covering the holiday period may accept a three-month credit on the policy or request a refund.

For military retirees who carry VGLI, the holiday provides temporary savings without reducing coverage. It does not apply to every retiree automatically; a retiree must actually hold an eligible VGLI policy. It does not change Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance for current active-duty or reserve members, the Survivor Benefit Plan, retired pay, TRICARE, or VA disability compensation. Veterans who are not military retirees may qualify on exactly the same policy-status [00:07:00] terms. Current and retired federal civilian employees receive no benefit through their federal employment unless they separately hold VGLI based on prior military service.

[00:07:09] Federal NDA Bill
---

This week also brought current reporting on one congressional proposal affecting federal employees: the Federal Worker Protection Act. Representative Eugene Vindman of Virginia introduced the bill on 31 August 2026 with Representative Suhas Subramanyam of Virginia as a cosponsor. During this reporting period, its verified status remained introduced and referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. It had not passed either chamber and was not law.

The bill responds to a proposed government-wide nondisclosure agreement for federal workers. It would require covered nondisclosure forms to state clearly that they do not override an employee’s right to make protected disclosures to Congress, the Government Accountability Office, inspectors general, the Office of Special Counsel, and other lawful channels. It would also prohibit agencies from invoking an agreement to punish, discipline, or threaten an [00:08:00] employee for a disclosure protected by law. FEDweek reported the proposal’s current context on 15 September 2026.

If enacted, agencies would have 180 days to bring existing covered agreements into compliance and notify affected workers of their rights. The bill would require Office of Special Counsel review of agreement templates, establish reporting and oversight duties, and give employees a route to federal court when an agency threatens or uses an agreement in retaliation for a protected disclosure. Those remedies do not exist under this proposal unless Congress passes it and it becomes law.

The direct effect would be on current federal employees and contractors asked to sign covered agreements. Retired federal employees would not receive a new annuity or insurance benefit, although the proposal could matter to a former employee involved in a protected disclosure or enforcement dispute. For active-duty and reserve military personnel, military retirees, veterans, and disabled veterans, H.R. 10198 creates no new pay, [00:09:00] health-care, disability, or retirement benefit. A person in one of those groups would be affected only through separate federal civilian employment or contractor status. Because the measure remains proposed legislation, workers should continue to rely on existing whistleblower law and authorized reporting channels rather than assume its new remedies are available.

[00:09:19] VA Staffing Shortages
---

[00:09:19]  Issues That Affect Veterans Affairs
---

Issues That Affect Veterans Affairs

The first Veterans Affairs issue is staffing. A VA Office of Inspector General report dated 11 September entered the news cycle on 15 September and found that all 139 reporting Veterans Health Administration facilities identified severe occupational staffing shortages. The review is congressionally required and reflects facility leaders’ perceptions at one point in time; the inspector general did not independently validate every response, and a shortage designation means an occupation is difficult to fill, not necessarily that a funded position is vacant.

Facility officials reported 4,712 severe shortages across 389 occupations for fiscal year [00:10:00] 2026. Medical officers were identified as a severe shortage by 97 percent of facilities, nurses by 86 percent, practical nurses by 59 percent, psychologists by 58 percent, VA police by 57 percent, and custodial workers by 53 percent.

VA disputed the use of the report as a vacancy measure. The department said actual vacancy rates were 15 percent for physicians and nine percent for nurses and argued that both were within historical norms and below some earlier peaks. VA also said physician pay caps impede recruiting and that it has asked Congress to address the disparity. The two statements are not necessarily contradictory: a facility can describe an occupation as very difficult to recruit even when every authorized position is not currently vacant.

For veterans, the relevant question is whether staffing pressure affects access, continuity, safety, or wait times at the local facility. The report does not prove that every site has delayed care, but it identifies system-wide [00:11:00] recruiting stress in the occupations responsible for clinical care, mental health, nursing support, security, and sanitation. Veterans experiencing delays should document appointment requests, use the facility’s patient advocate, and ask whether community care is available under the applicable eligibility rules.

[00:11:17] Homelessness Grants
---

The second VA development is a record $1.17 billion in grants to 680 organizations serving veterans who are homeless or at risk of homelessness. VA announced the awards on 14 September for distribution in fiscal year 2027. Of the total, $855 million will fund one-year Supportive Services for Veteran Families grants beginning 1 October 2026. Those organizations provide case management, homelessness prevention, housing identification, and rapid rehousing. Another $318 million will fund three-year Grant and Per Diem awards for transitional housing, service centers, transition-in-place housing, and specialized housing for women, chronically mentally ill, frail, [00:12:00] elderly, or terminally ill veterans and veterans caring for minor children.

These are grants to service organizations, not automatic cash payments to individual veterans. A veteran needing housing help must connect with VA or a funded local provider and complete the relevant eligibility and intake process. Veterans who are homeless or at imminent risk can call the National Call Center for Homeless Veterans at 877-424-3838.

[00:12:25] PFAS Study Findings
---

Finally, new research published on 14 September found that veterans ages 20 through 39 had blood concentrations of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances—PFAS—13 percent to 24 percent higher than civilians of the same age. The analysis used National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data collected from 2003 through 2018. Male veterans had higher concentrations than female veterans, while older veterans had levels comparable to civilian peers.

The research was cross-sectional and did not identify where participants encountered PFAS, so it cannot prove that [00:13:00] military service caused an individual’s exposure. A high level also does not mean that a person will develop cancer or another illness. The study adds evidence of a population-level difference that warrants further investigation and clinical discussion. Veterans concerned about exposure should speak with a health-care professional about their service history and appropriate monitoring; the study itself did not create a new VA presumption, disability rating, or automatic benefit.

[00:13:26] Wrap Up and Subscribe
---

And that's your Weekly Briefing. Staying on top of these changes is key to navigating your career, your retirement, and your benefits.

Thank you for tuning in. Be sure to subscribe wherever you get your podcasts, so you never miss an update. We’ll be back next week with another roundup of the news that matters most to the military and veteran community.​